Supreme Court is the Constitutional body under Article 124 of our Constitution. Supreme Court is guardian of our constitution, Highest Constitution Court, Final Court of Appeal and Highest Judicial forum. Originally the strength of Supreme Court was 1 + 7 = 8 (1 Chief Justice and 7 Judges). Present strength is 1 + 33 = 34 (1 Chief Justice and 33 Judges). Supreme Court was established on 28th January, 1950 and replaced Federal Court of India. Before Federal Court of India, Privy Council used to be the Highest Court of India.
Motto of Supreme Court
Motto of Supreme Court is Whence Law (Dharma), Thence Victory (Yatho Dharma Statho Jaya) meaning that when law or dharma (righteousness) is there, then there is victory.
The present Chief Justice of India is justice Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, He is 50th CJI. He was administered oath of office by president Mrs. Draupadi Murmu on 9th Nov 2022. 49th CJI Justice U U Lalit retired on 8th Nov 2022. He recommended the name of Justice Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud as his successor. This is a convention that retiring CJI recommends the name of his successor about a month before his retirement.
Justice D Y Chandrachud’s father, Justice Y V Chandrachud also served as CJI during 1978 – 1985. He had the longest tenure as CJ (more than 7 years). The shortest tenure as CJI was of Justice Kamal Narain Singh in 1991 (just for 17 days).
Appointment of Chief Justice and Judges of Supreme Court
Chief Justice and Judges of Supreme Court are appointed by the President. The collegiums of Supreme Court recommends the names for appointment as Chief Justice of India, judges of Supreme Court, Chief Justice and judges of various High Courts & transfer of Chief Justice & Judges of a High Court from one High Court to another.
Supreme Court collegiums consists of Chief Justice of India & 4 seniormost Judges of Supreme Court. Collegium of Supreme Court recommended two names for appointment as new judges of Supreme Court. President Mrs Draupdi Murmu gave her accent on the
recommendations of collegiums and appointed two new judges of Supreme Court. Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud administered the oath of office to two new judges on 13/2/23. The apex court now has four sitting women judges – the highest ever in its history.
Oath of Office
Oath of office to Chief Justice of India is administrated by President and oath of office to the Judges of Supreme Court is administered by Chief Justice of India.
Tenure
Tenure of Chief Justice of India and other judges of Supreme Court is upto the age of 65 years. Tenure is fixed. Removal before completion of the tenure is not possible. The only exception is removal by Parliament. (impeachment word is used only for removal of President)
Removal motion to remove a judge of SC can be introduced in either house of Parliament and has to be passed by both houses separately by 2/3rd (Special majority).
Justice H.J. Kania was first Chief Justice of India. 47th Chief Justice of India was Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde, 48th Chief Justice of India was Justice N.V. Ramana and 49th Justice U U Lalit.
Bibi Fatima was 1st woman Judge of Supreme Court. No woman till date has become Chief Justice of India and Justice B.V. Nagarathna may become 1st woman Chief Justice of India in September, 2027.
Justice Mrs. Leila Seth was the first woman Chief Justice of a High Court (Himachal Pradesh) in India.
Chief Justice of India Mohd. Hidayatullah once held the post of Acting President in 1969 and later he was also elected as Vice-President of India and served the country during 1979 – 1984.
Jurisdiction of Judicial Court
Jurisdiction of Supreme Court can be classified under 3 categories as:
Jurisdiction
Original Appellate Advisory (1) Original Jurisdiction
The following areas comes under the Original Jurisdiction of Supreme Court:
- Any dispute between centre vs State/States or among two or more than two states is resolved by Supreme
- Direct transfer of Civil or Criminal Case from one High Court to
- Article 32 (Right to Constitutional Remedies) any Indian citizen can approach to the Supreme Court for protection of his Fundamental Rights if violated or breached by any action of the Government and Supreme Court can protect our Fundamental Rights by issuing five different types of writs (Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Certiorari, Prohibition & Quo-warranto).
Note:- We can also move High Court for protection of our Fundamental Rights under article
- Similarly High Court too can issue these five types of writs to protect our Fundamental Rights.
- If in the opinion on Supreme Court a matter is of National importance and it should be decided by Supreme Court then Supreme Court can direct various High Courts to transfer all such cases to Supreme Court and Supreme Court alone will decide the matter to avoid multiplicity of the decisions. Recently Supreme Court has directed all High Courts to transfer all Petitions relating to same sex marriage to it and Supreme Court alone will decide the
- Constitutional Review Supreme Court can review provisions of our constitution and can make/dictate necessary
- Self cognisance Supreme Court can take self cognisance on any matter of local or national
- May dictate parliament to make law on any specific
- Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, International Commercial Arbitration can also be initiated in Supreme
(2) Appellate Jurisdiction
- The decision of a High Court in both Civil/Criminal case can be challenged in Supreme Court if certified by High
- If in the opinion of High Court in Civil case a matter is of National Importance and it should be decided by Supreme Court, the same can be transferred to Supreme
- In Criminal case if High Court awards ten years of imprisonment, more than 10 years of imprisonment, life imprisonment or death penalty to a person earlier not convicted by the Lower Court then that Criminal case will be referred to Supreme No certification by High Court is needed.
- Supreme Court can accept appeal on its own discretion against decision of any court or tribunal in
(3) Advisory Jurisdiction (ARTICLE 143)
We have borrowed this feature in our Constitution from Canadian Constitution. Only our President can seek legal advice on any question of National or International importance from the Supreme Court. This process is also known as Presidential reference to Supreme Court of India. The Supreme Court is under an obligation to answer the questions put to it but it discretionary for the Supreme Court to answer or not the questions put to it. If not then with valid reasons. The minimum number of Judges on bench of advisory opinion on the reference by the President must be one half of the total strength of Supreme Court.
In Delhi Laws Act Case, Cauvery. Dispute Tribunal Case etc., legal advice was given by Supreme Court to the President but in Ismail Faruqi vs Union of India Case regarding Ram Janmbhoomi – Babri Masjid Dispute, Supreme Court did not provide legal advice to the President. Supreme Court contended that the Presidential reference seeking the Court’s opinion on whether there was initially a temple where the Babri Masjid later stood was unnecessary and superfluous and also against the concept of secularism favouring one religious section over another and hence, doesn’t need to be answered.
Some of other cases that were referred to Supreme Court for legal advice by the President include Kerala Education Bill, Beru Bari Case, Sea Customs Act, Special Court Reference Case, Special Courts Bill etc.
WRITS
Supreme Court under Article 32, (Fundamental Right to Constitutional Remedies) can issue five different types of writs to protect our Fundamental Rights. Writs are issued against lower courts, Tribunals, Govt. Authorities etc. and not against private individuals, bodies, organisations etc but in exceptional circumstances, writs can be issued against private individuals, bodies & organisations too. These writs are as:
- Habeas Corpus (Produce the body) – to release a person who has been detained
- Mandamus (we order/we command) – to secure the performance of Public duties by lower court, tribunal or public
- Certiorari (we certify) – we certify that this case is fit to be Review the case so that justice can be granted to the victim.
- Prohibition (To Prohibit) – to prohibit an inferior court from continuing the proceedings in a particular case where it has no jurisdiction to
- Quo Warranto (By What Authority) – to restrain a person from holding a public office which he is not
